MERIT

Find out if your idea has any.

Describe the startup idea. Merit grades it live across seven weighted dimensions — against your actual skills, budget, and hours — and sends the full evaluation to your inbox.

GRADE MY IDEAFree. ~90 seconds.

What you get

The report, not a pep talk.

Below is an excerpt from a Merit evaluation. This is the register: specific, cited, and willing to say no.

SAMPLE — MOBILE APP

MealPrepPal — weekly meal-prep planner for busy professionals

44/100

Not Now

MealPrepPal is a technically credible build for your skill set entering a category that is already saturated with well-funded apps competing on exactly the 'simplicity' axis you've claimed. At $4.99/month with 5–15 hours per week and no differentiation on the page, the revenue math and the discovery problem combine to make this a hard road. The single change that would most raise this grade is identifying one specific user segment or constraint that existing apps structurally cannot serve — and confirming, with real conversations, that segment will pay.

Uniqueness3/10

'Simpler than the existing apps' is a claim, not a differentiator — Mealime's entire brand pitch is simplicity, and it has millions of downloads. You have named no concrete feature, constraint, or angle that existing apps can't replicate or haven't already built; without one, this is a commoditized re-entry into a solved category.

Money Potential3/10

At $4.99/month you need roughly 200 paying subscribers just to clear $1,000/month in revenue, and consumer subscription apps in crowded categories churn hard — reaching and retaining that base with 5–15 hours a week and no marketing budget is a structural problem, not just a challenge. The revenue ceiling for this founder's version of this idea, given their constraints, is low enough to actively work against the effort required.

Skill Fit6/10

Three years of React Native is a genuine and directly relevant advantage — you can build this without hiring, which matters at a $500–2K budget. The constraint is 5–15 hours per week, which limits build velocity but doesn't structurally break the idea the way a non-technical founder would be broken here.

+ four more dimensions, strengths, risks, and one specific next step. Delivered by email.


How it's scored

Seven dimensions. Weighted. Open.

Each dimension is scored 1–10 and weighted into a final grade out of 100. Skill Fit is scored against you specifically — your skills, your hours, your budget — which is why the same idea grades differently in different hands.

Market Demand20
Money Potential18
Speed to First Sale14
Skill Fit14
Ease of Launch12
Scalability12
Uniqueness10
WEIGHTS SUM TO 100

The honest bit

Most ideas score in the 50s. Yours might too.

Merit is calibrated so that the average submission lands in the 50s and 60s. A 90 is rare enough to mean something. If every idea scored 85, the number would be worthless — so it doesn't.

That means this tool will probably tell you something you don't want to hear, with reasons attached, pulled from your own submission. We think that's worth more than a compliment. An honest 54 before you quit your job is cheap. Finding out the same thing a year in is not.


The grade is waiting.

GRADE MY IDEA